2017
Yi, Jiazi; Parrein, Benoit
RFC8218: Multipath Extension for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2) Miscellaneous
RFC 8218, 2017.
@misc{rfc8218,
title = {RFC8218: Multipath Extension for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)},
author = {Jiazi Yi and Benoit Parrein},
url = {https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8218.txt},
doi = {10.17487/RFC8218},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
number = {8218},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
series = {Request for Comments},
abstract = {This document specifies a multipath extension for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) to discover multiple disjoint paths for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs). Considering the characteristics of MANETs, especially the dynamic network topology, using multiple paths can increase aggregated throughput and improve the reliability by avoiding single route failures. The interoperability with OLSRv2 is retained.},
howpublished = {RFC 8218},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document specifies a multipath extension for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) to discover multiple disjoint paths for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs). Considering the characteristics of MANETs, especially the dynamic network topology, using multiple paths can increase aggregated throughput and improve the reliability by avoiding single route failures. The interoperability with OLSRv2 is retained.
Clausen, Thomas; Herberg, Ulrich; Yi, Jiazi
RFC8116: Security Threats to the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2) Miscellaneous
RFC 8116, 2017.
@misc{rfc8116,
title = {RFC8116: Security Threats to the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Ulrich Herberg and Jiazi Yi},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/rfc8116.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/rfc8116},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
number = {8116},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
series = {Request for Comments},
abstract = {This document analyzes common security threats to the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) and describes their potential impacts on Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) operations. It also analyzes which of these security vulnerabilities can be mitigated when using the mandatory-to-implement security mechanisms for OLSRv2 and how the vulnerabilities are mitigated.},
howpublished = {RFC 8116},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document analyzes common security threats to the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) and describes their potential impacts on Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) operations. It also analyzes which of these security vulnerabilities can be mitigated when using the mandatory-to-implement security mechanisms for OLSRv2 and how the vulnerabilities are mitigated.
2016
Clausen, Thomas; Yi, Jiazi; Herberg, Ulrich
RFC7985: Security Threats to Simplified Multicast Forwarding (SMF) Miscellaneous
IETF - Informational RFC 7985, 2016, ISSN: 2070-1721.
@misc{RFC7985,
title = {RFC7985: Security Threats to Simplified Multicast Forwarding (SMF)},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Jiazi Yi and Ulrich Herberg},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/rfc7985.txt.pdf},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7985},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-02},
abstract = {This document analyzes security threats to Simplified Multicast Forwarding (SMF), including vulnerabilities of duplicate packet detection and relay set selection mechanisms. This document is not intended to propose solutions to the threats described. In addition, this document updates RFC 7186 regarding threats to the relay set selection mechanisms using the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) (RFC 6130)},
howpublished = {IETF - Informational RFC 7985},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document analyzes security threats to Simplified Multicast Forwarding (SMF), including vulnerabilities of duplicate packet detection and relay set selection mechanisms. This document is not intended to propose solutions to the threats described. In addition, this document updates RFC 7186 regarding threats to the relay set selection mechanisms using the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) (RFC 6130)
Herberg, Ulrich; Cole, Robert G.; Chakeres, Ian; Clausen, Thomas
RFC7939: Definition of Managed Objects for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol Miscellaneous
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7939, 2016, ISSN: 2070-1721.
@misc{RFC7939,
title = {RFC7939: Definition of Managed Objects for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol},
author = {Ulrich Herberg and Robert G. Cole and Ian Chakeres and Thomas Clausen},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/RFC7939.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/rfc7939},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
number = {7939},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
series = {Request for Comments},
abstract = {This document replaces RFC 6779; it contains revisions and extensions to the original document. It defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes objects for configuring parameters of the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) process on a router. The extensions described in this document add objects and values to support the NHDP optimization specified in RFC 7466. The MIB module defined in this document, denoted NHDP-MIB, also reports state, performance information, and notifications about NHDP. This additional state and performance information is useful to troubleshoot problems and performance issues during neighbor discovery.},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7939},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document replaces RFC 6779; it contains revisions and extensions to the original document. It defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes objects for configuring parameters of the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) process on a router. The extensions described in this document add objects and values to support the NHDP optimization specified in RFC 7466. The MIB module defined in this document, denoted NHDP-MIB, also reports state, performance information, and notifications about NHDP. This additional state and performance information is useful to troubleshoot problems and performance issues during neighbor discovery.
2015
Dearlove, Christopher; Clausen, Thomas
RFC7722: Multi-Topology Extension for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2) Miscellaneous
IETF - Experimental RFC 7722, 2015, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7722).
@misc{RFC7722,
title = {RFC7722: Multi-Topology Extension for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)},
author = {Christopher Dearlove and Thomas Clausen},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7722.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7722},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-31},
abstract = {This specification describes an extension to the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) to support multiple routing topologies, while retaining interoperability with OLSRv2 routers that do not implement this extension. This specification updates RFCs 7188 and 7631 by modifying and extending TLV registries and descriptions.},
howpublished = {IETF - Experimental RFC 7722},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7722},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This specification describes an extension to the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) to support multiple routing topologies, while retaining interoperability with OLSRv2 routers that do not implement this extension. This specification updates RFCs 7188 and 7631 by modifying and extending TLV registries and descriptions.
Clausen, Thomas; Dearlove, Christopher
RFC7631 – TLV Naming in the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Generalized Packet/Message Format Miscellaneous
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7631, 2015, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7631).
@misc{RFC7631,
title = {RFC7631 – TLV Naming in the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Generalized Packet/Message Format},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Christopher Dearlove},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7631.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7631},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-01},
abstract = {This document reorganizes the naming of already-allocated TLV (type-length-value) types and type extensions in the "Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) Parameters" registries defined by RFC 5444 to use names appropriately. It has no consequences in terms of any protocol implementation. This document also updates the Expert Review guidelines in RFC 5444, so as to establish a policy for consistent naming of future TLV type and type extension allocations. It makes no other changes to RFC 5444.},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7631},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7631},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document reorganizes the naming of already-allocated TLV (type-length-value) types and type extensions in the "Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) Parameters" registries defined by RFC 5444 to use names appropriately. It has no consequences in terms of any protocol implementation. This document also updates the Expert Review guidelines in RFC 5444, so as to establish a policy for consistent naming of future TLV type and type extension allocations. It makes no other changes to RFC 5444.
Dearlove, Christopher; Clausen, Thomas
RFC7466: An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) Miscellaneous
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7466, 2015, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7466).
@misc{RFC7466,
title = {RFC7466: An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)},
author = {Christopher Dearlove and Thomas Clausen},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7466.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7466},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-03-01},
abstract = {The link quality mechanism of the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) enables "ignoring" some 1-hop neighbors if the measured link quality from that 1-hop neighbor is below an acceptable threshold while still retaining the corresponding link information as acquired from the HELLO message exchange. This allows immediate reinstatement of the 1-hop neighbor if the link quality later improves sufficiently. NHDP also collects information about symmetric 2-hop neighbors. However, it specifies that if a link from a symmetric 1-hop neighbor ceases being symmetric, including while "ignored" (as described above), then corresponding symmetric 2-hop neighbors are removed. This may lead to symmetric 2-hop neighborhood information being permanently removed (until further HELLO messages are received) if the link quality of a symmetric 1-hop neighbor drops below the acceptable threshold, even if only for a moment. This specification updates RFC 6130 "Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)" and RFC 7181 "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)" to permit, as an option, retaining, but ignoring, symmetric 2-hop information when the link quality from the corresponding 1-hop neighbor drops below the acceptable threshold. This allows immediate reinstatement of the symmetric 2-hop neighbor if the link quality later improves sufficiently, thus making the symmetric 2-hop neighborhood more "robust".},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7466},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7466},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
The link quality mechanism of the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) enables "ignoring" some 1-hop neighbors if the measured link quality from that 1-hop neighbor is below an acceptable threshold while still retaining the corresponding link information as acquired from the HELLO message exchange. This allows immediate reinstatement of the 1-hop neighbor if the link quality later improves sufficiently. NHDP also collects information about symmetric 2-hop neighbors. However, it specifies that if a link from a symmetric 1-hop neighbor ceases being symmetric, including while "ignored" (as described above), then corresponding symmetric 2-hop neighbors are removed. This may lead to symmetric 2-hop neighborhood information being permanently removed (until further HELLO messages are received) if the link quality of a symmetric 1-hop neighbor drops below the acceptable threshold, even if only for a moment. This specification updates RFC 6130 "Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)" and RFC 7181 "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)" to permit, as an option, retaining, but ignoring, symmetric 2-hop information when the link quality from the corresponding 1-hop neighbor drops below the acceptable threshold. This allows immediate reinstatement of the symmetric 2-hop neighbor if the link quality later improves sufficiently, thus making the symmetric 2-hop neighborhood more "robust".
2014
Clausen, Thomas; Dearlove, Christopher; Jacquet, Philippe; Herberg, Ulrich
RFC7181: The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 Miscellaneous
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7681, 2014, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7181).
@misc{RFC7181,
title = {RFC7181: The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Christopher Dearlove and Philippe Jacquet and Ulrich Herberg},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7181.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7181},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
abstract = {This specification describes version 2 of the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSRv2) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs).},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7681},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7181},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This specification describes version 2 of the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSRv2) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs).
Herberg, Ulrich; Clausen, Thomas; Dearlove, Christopher
RFC7182: Integrity Check Value and Timestamp TLV Definitions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) Miscellaneous
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7182, 2014, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7182).
@misc{RFC7182,
title = {RFC7182: Integrity Check Value and Timestamp TLV Definitions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)},
author = {Ulrich Herberg and Thomas Clausen and Christopher Dearlove},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7182.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7182},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
abstract = {This document revises, extends, and replaces RFC 6622. It describes general and flexible TLVs for representing cryptographic Integrity Check Values (ICVs) and timestamps, using the generalized Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) packet/message format defined in RFC 5444. It defines two Packet TLVs, two Message TLVs, and two Address Block TLVs for affixing ICVs and timestamps to a packet, a message, and one or more addresses, respectively.},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7182},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7182},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document revises, extends, and replaces RFC 6622. It describes general and flexible TLVs for representing cryptographic Integrity Check Values (ICVs) and timestamps, using the generalized Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) packet/message format defined in RFC 5444. It defines two Packet TLVs, two Message TLVs, and two Address Block TLVs for affixing ICVs and timestamps to a packet, a message, and one or more addresses, respectively.
Herberg, Ulrich; Dearlove, Christopher; Clausen, Thomas
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7183, 2014, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7183).
@misc{RFC7183,
title = {RFC7183: Integrity Protection for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)},
author = {Ulrich Herberg and Christopher Dearlove and Thomas Clausen},
url = {https://epizeuxis.net/site/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7183.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7183},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
abstract = {This document specifies integrity and replay protection for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2). This protection is achieved by using an HMAC-SHA-256 Integrity Check Value (ICV) TLV and a Timestamp TLV based on Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) time. The mechanism in this specification can also be used for other protocols that use the generalized packet/message format described in RFC 5444. This document updates RFC 6130 and RFC 7181 by mandating the implementation of this integrity and replay protection in NHDP and OLSRv2.},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7183},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7183},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document specifies integrity and replay protection for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2). This protection is achieved by using an HMAC-SHA-256 Integrity Check Value (ICV) TLV and a Timestamp TLV based on Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) time. The mechanism in this specification can also be used for other protocols that use the generalized packet/message format described in RFC 5444. This document updates RFC 6130 and RFC 7181 by mandating the implementation of this integrity and replay protection in NHDP and OLSRv2.
Herberg, Ulrich; Cole, Robert G.; Clausen, Thomas
RFC7184: Definition of Managed Objects for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 Miscellaneous
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7184, 2014, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7184).
@misc{RFC7184,
title = {RFC7184: Definition of Managed Objects for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2},
author = {Ulrich Herberg and Robert G. Cole and Thomas Clausen},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7184.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7184},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
abstract = {This document defines the Management Information Base (MIB) module for configuring and managing the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2). The OLSRv2-MIB module is structured into configuration information, state information, performance information, and notifications. This additional state and performance information is useful for troubleshooting problems and performance issues of the routing protocol. Two levels of compliance allow this MIB module to be deployed on constrained routers.},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7184},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7184},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document defines the Management Information Base (MIB) module for configuring and managing the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2). The OLSRv2-MIB module is structured into configuration information, state information, performance information, and notifications. This additional state and performance information is useful for troubleshooting problems and performance issues of the routing protocol. Two levels of compliance allow this MIB module to be deployed on constrained routers.
Dearlove, Christopher; Clausen, Thomas; Jacquet, Philippe
RFC7185: Rationale for the Use of Link Metrics in the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2) Miscellaneous
IETF - Informational RFC 7185, 2014, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7185).
@misc{RFC7185,
title = {RFC7185: Rationale for the Use of Link Metrics in the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)},
author = {Christopher Dearlove and Thomas Clausen and Philippe Jacquet},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7185.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7185},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
abstract = {The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) includes the ability to assign metrics to links and to use those metrics to allow routing by other than minimum hop count routes. This document provides a historic record of the rationale for, and design considerations behind, how link metrics were included in OLSRv2.},
howpublished = {IETF - Informational RFC 7185},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7185},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) includes the ability to assign metrics to links and to use those metrics to allow routing by other than minimum hop count routes. This document provides a historic record of the rationale for, and design considerations behind, how link metrics were included in OLSRv2.
Yi, Jiazi; Herberg, Ulrich; Clausen, Thomas
RFC7186: Security Threats for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) Miscellaneous
IETF - Informational RFC 7186, 2014, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7186).
@misc{RFC7186,
title = {RFC7186: Security Threats for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)},
author = {Jiazi Yi and Ulrich Herberg and Thomas Clausen},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7186.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7186},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
abstract = {This document analyzes common security threats of the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and describes their potential impacts on Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) routing protocols using NHDP. This document is not intended to propose solutions to the threats described.},
howpublished = {IETF - Informational RFC 7186},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7186},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document analyzes common security threats of the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and describes their potential impacts on Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) routing protocols using NHDP. This document is not intended to propose solutions to the threats described.
Dearlove, Christopher; Clausen, Thomas
RFC7187: Routing Multipoint Relay Optimization for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2) Miscellaneous
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7187, 2014, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7187).
@misc{RFC7187,
title = {RFC7187: Routing Multipoint Relay Optimization for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)},
author = {Christopher Dearlove and Thomas Clausen},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7187.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7187},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
abstract = {This specification updates the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) with an optimization to improve the selection of routing multipoint relays. The optimization retains full interoperability between implementations of OLSRv2 with and without this optimization.},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7187},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7187},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This specification updates the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) with an optimization to improve the selection of routing multipoint relays. The optimization retains full interoperability between implementations of OLSRv2 with and without this optimization.
Dearlove, Christopher; Clausen, Thomas
IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7188, 2014, ISSN: 2070-1721, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7188).
@misc{Clausen2014b,
title = {RFC7188: Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2) and MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) Extension TLVs},
author = {Christopher Dearlove and Thomas Clausen},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc7188.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC7188},
issn = {2070-1721},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
abstract = {This specification describes extensions to definitions of TLVs used by the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) and the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) to increase their abilities to accommodate protocol extensions. This document updates RFC 7181 (OLSRv2) and RFC 6130 (NHDP).},
howpublished = {IETF - Proposed Standard RFC 7188},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7188},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This specification describes extensions to definitions of TLVs used by the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) and the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) to increase their abilities to accommodate protocol extensions. This document updates RFC 7181 (OLSRv2) and RFC 6130 (NHDP).
2012
Clausen, Thomas; Herberg, Ulrich
RFC6622: Integrity Check Value and Timestamp TLV Definitions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) Miscellaneous
2012, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6622).
@misc{Clausen2012b,
title = {RFC6622: Integrity Check Value and Timestamp TLV Definitions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Ulrich Herberg},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc6622.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC6622},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-01},
publisher = {IETF - Std. Track RFC 6622},
organization = {The Internet Engineering Task Force},
abstract = {This document describes general and flexible TLVs for representing cryptographic Integrity Check Values (ICVs) (i.e., digital signatures or Message Authentication Codes (MACs)) as well as timestamps, using the generalized Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) packet/message format defined in RFC 5444. It defines two Packet TLVs, two Message TLVs, and two Address Block TLVs for affixing ICVs and timestamps to a packet, a message, and an address, respectively.},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6622},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document describes general and flexible TLVs for representing cryptographic Integrity Check Values (ICVs) (i.e., digital signatures or Message Authentication Codes (MACs)) as well as timestamps, using the generalized Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) packet/message format defined in RFC 5444. It defines two Packet TLVs, two Message TLVs, and two Address Block TLVs for affixing ICVs and timestamps to a packet, a message, and an address, respectively.
2011
Clausen, Thomas; Dearlove, Christopher; Dean, Justin
RFC6130: Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) Miscellaneous
2011, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6130).
@misc{Clausen2011bb,
title = {RFC6130: Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Christopher Dearlove and Justin Dean},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc6130.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC6130},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-03-01},
publisher = {IETF - Std. Track RFC 6130},
organization = {The Internet Engineering Task Force},
abstract = {This document describes a 1-hop and symmetric 2-hop neighborhood discovery protocol (NHDP) for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs).},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6130},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document describes a 1-hop and symmetric 2-hop neighborhood discovery protocol (NHDP) for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs).
Levis, Phil; Clausen, Thomas; Hui, Jonatan; Gnawali, Omprakash; Ko, JeongGil
RFC6206: The Trickle Algorithm Miscellaneous
2011, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6206).
@misc{Levis2011,
title = {RFC6206: The Trickle Algorithm},
author = {Phil Levis and Thomas Clausen and Jonatan Hui and Omprakash Gnawali and JeongGil Ko},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc6206.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC6206},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-03-01},
publisher = {IETF - Std. Track RFC 6206},
organization = {The Internet Engineering Task Force},
abstract = {The Trickle algorithm allows nodes in a lossy shared medium (e.g., low-power and lossy networks) to exchange information in a highly robust, energy efficient, simple, and scalable manner. Dynamically adjusting transmission windows allows Trickle to spread new information on the scale of link-layer transmission times while sending only a few messages per hour when information does not change. A simple suppression mechanism and transmission point selection allow Trickle's communication rate to scale logarithmically with density. This document describes the Trickle algorithm and considerations in its use.},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6206},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
The Trickle algorithm allows nodes in a lossy shared medium (e.g., low-power and lossy networks) to exchange information in a highly robust, energy efficient, simple, and scalable manner. Dynamically adjusting transmission windows allows Trickle to spread new information on the scale of link-layer transmission times while sending only a few messages per hour when information does not change. A simple suppression mechanism and transmission point selection allow Trickle's communication rate to scale logarithmically with density. This document describes the Trickle algorithm and considerations in its use.
2009
Clausen, Thomas; Dearlove, Christopher
RFC5497: Representing Multi-Value Time in MANETs Miscellaneous
2009, (http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5497.txt).
@misc{Clausen2009,
title = {RFC5497: Representing Multi-Value Time in MANETs},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Christopher Dearlove},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc5497.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC5497},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-03-01},
publisher = {IETF - Std. Track RFC},
organization = {The Internet Engineering Task Force},
abstract = {This document describes a general and flexible TLV (type-length-value structure) for representing time-values, such as an interval or a duration, using the generalized Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) packet/ message format. It defines two Message TLVs and two Address Block TLVs for representing validity and interval times for MANET routing protocols.},
note = {http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5497.txt},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document describes a general and flexible TLV (type-length-value structure) for representing time-values, such as an interval or a duration, using the generalized Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) packet/ message format. It defines two Message TLVs and two Address Block TLVs for representing validity and interval times for MANET routing protocols.
Clausen, Thomas; Dearlove, Christopher; Dean, Justin; Adjih, Cedric
RFC5444 - Generalized Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Packet/Message Format Miscellaneous
2009, (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5444.txt).
@misc{Clausen2009b,
title = {RFC5444 - Generalized Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Packet/Message Format},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Christopher Dearlove and Justin Dean and Cedric Adjih},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc5444.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC5444},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-02-01},
publisher = {IETF - Std. Track RFC},
organization = {The Internet Engineering Task Force},
abstract = {This document specifies a packet format capable of carrying multiple messages that may be used by mobile ad hoc network routing protocols.},
note = {http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5444.txt},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document specifies a packet format capable of carrying multiple messages that may be used by mobile ad hoc network routing protocols.
Baccelli, Emmanuel; Clausen, Thomas; Jacquet, Philippe; Nguyen, Dang
RFC5449 - OSPF Multipoint Relay (MPR) Extension for Ad Hoc Networks Miscellaneous
2009, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5449).
@misc{Baccelli2009,
title = {RFC5449 - OSPF Multipoint Relay (MPR) Extension for Ad Hoc Networks},
author = {Emmanuel Baccelli and Thomas Clausen and Philippe Jacquet and Dang Nguyen},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc5449.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC5449},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-02-01},
publisher = {IETF - Exp. RFC},
organization = {The Internet Engineering Task Force},
abstract = {This document specifies an OSPFv3 interface type tailored for mobile ad hoc networks. This interface type is derived from the broadcast interface type, and is denoted the "OSPFv3 MANET interface type". This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5449},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document specifies an OSPFv3 interface type tailored for mobile ad hoc networks. This interface type is derived from the broadcast interface type, and is denoted the "OSPFv3 MANET interface type". This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
2008
Clausen, Thomas; Dearlove, Christopher; Adamson, Brian
RFC5148: Jitter Considerations in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) Miscellaneous
2008, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5148).
@misc{Clausen2008,
title = {RFC5148: Jitter Considerations in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Christopher Dearlove and Brian Adamson},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc5148.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC5148},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-02-01},
publisher = {RFC},
organization = {The Internet Engineering Task Force},
abstract = {This document provides recommendations for jittering (randomly modifying timing) of control traffic transmissions in Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) routing protocols to reduce the probability of transmission collisions,},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5148},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document provides recommendations for jittering (randomly modifying timing) of control traffic transmissions in Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) routing protocols to reduce the probability of transmission collisions,
2003
Clausen, Thomas; Jacquet, Philippe
RFC3626: The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Miscellaneous
2003, (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3626).
@misc{Clausen2003,
title = {RFC3626: The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol},
author = {Thomas Clausen and Philippe Jacquet},
url = {http://www.thomasclausen.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/rfc3626.txt.pdf},
doi = {10.17487/RFC3626},
year = {2003},
date = {2003-10-01},
publisher = {The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) - MANET Working Group},
organization = {The Internet Engineering Task Force},
abstract = {This document describes the Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. The protocol is an optimization of the classical link state algorithm tailored to the requirements of a mobile wireless LAN. The key concept used in the protocol is that of multipoint relays (MPRs). MPRs are selected nodes which forward broadcast messages during the flooding process. This technique substantially reduces the message overhead as compared to a classical flooding mechanism, where every node retransmits each message when it receives the first copy of the message. In OLSR, link state information is generated only by nodes elected as MPRs. Thus, a second optimization is achieved by minimizing the number of control messages flooded in the network. As a third optimization, an MPR node may chose to report only links between itself and its MPR selectors. Hence, as contrary to the classic link state algorithm, partial link state information is distributed in the network. This information is then used for route calculation. OLSR provides optimal routes (in terms of number of hops). The protocol is particularly suitable for large and dense networks as the technique of MPRs works well in this context.},
note = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3626},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
This document describes the Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. The protocol is an optimization of the classical link state algorithm tailored to the requirements of a mobile wireless LAN. The key concept used in the protocol is that of multipoint relays (MPRs). MPRs are selected nodes which forward broadcast messages during the flooding process. This technique substantially reduces the message overhead as compared to a classical flooding mechanism, where every node retransmits each message when it receives the first copy of the message. In OLSR, link state information is generated only by nodes elected as MPRs. Thus, a second optimization is achieved by minimizing the number of control messages flooded in the network. As a third optimization, an MPR node may chose to report only links between itself and its MPR selectors. Hence, as contrary to the classic link state algorithm, partial link state information is distributed in the network. This information is then used for route calculation. OLSR provides optimal routes (in terms of number of hops). The protocol is particularly suitable for large and dense networks as the technique of MPRs works well in this context.