Whatever AI LinkedIn uses for automatically associating “tags” to “posts” or “shares” is often impressively accurate (then again, I would guess that most of the “tags” really are just keywords extracted from the post/share, although these examples below most definitely are not). But, sometimes, it seems that that AI is just on drugs. Here’re a couple of examples of hillarious tagging of some of my posts:
This next example is equally hillarious. To a posting complaining about incessantly generalizing from (network) protocol comparisons, apparently LinkedIn’s AI thought “Ohhhh, Economics”:
Well, maybe the AI just saw “curves going up and down” and concluded that Economics might be the right field? 🙂
Mostly, thought, the auto-tag feature is impressive. But, it’s hillarious when it’s not.